SOVEREIGNTY LIES WITH SCOTTISH PEOPLE? -
NOT ACCORDING TO UK GOVERNMENT OR SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT
ANSWERS ‘NOT ACCEPTABLE’ - INDEPENDENCE
FIRST
INDEPENDENCE FIRST, the referendum
campaign recently wrote to both the UK Government and the Scottish
Parliament demanding a democratic referendum for the people of Scotland on
independence.
The Scottish Parliament replied: “The
Scotland Act 1998 sets out the statutory framework for the Scottish
devolution settlement. Schedule 5 to the Act defines matters which are
reserved to the United Kingdom Parliament.”
“The devolution settlement and
constitutional matters generally are reserved matters under the Act. The
Government of the United Kingdom is responsible therefore for considering
any fundamental changes to the existing devolution framework in Scotland.”
Joe Middleton Press Officer of
Independence First commented: “In other words, we’re passing the buck to our
colleagues down south! However it does not matter what the UK Labour
Government put into their devolved parliament bill, the Scottish people have
an absolute right to self determination under international law.”
The Scottish Office in London replied
“It is worth noting that in the UK political system the UK parliament is
sovereign and it is for Parliament to decide whether or not to hold a
referendum on any particular issue - and what the terms of any referendum
should be.”
Mr Middleton commented ”This is simply
not accurate, in England Parliament is sovereign, but in Scotland the people
are sovereign. These answers are not acceptable. Obviously both the UK
Government and Scottish Parliament are deliberately ignoring Scotland’s
rights to democracy under international law.”
INDEPENDENCE
MOVEMENT UNITES FOR ‘DEMOCRACY FOR SCOTLAND’ RALLY
    
    
   
Photos from the march through
Edinburgh and the subsequent demonstration outside the
Scottish Parliament.
Campaigners who are calling for a referendum on Scottish independence have
had a highly successful march and rally in Edinburgh on Saturday the 30th
of September. The march and rally was for Independence First
the Scottish independence referendum campaign. A spokesperson for the
campaign said it was "a powerful message to the Scottish parliament that
democracy will not be denied."
Around a
thousand people marched behind a full pipe band from East Market Street
onto Princes Street, up the mound, over George IV Bridge and down the
Royal Mile to end up at a rally outside the Scottish Parliament. There was
an excellent turnout of members of the public and political activists from
all the various groups who support Scottish independence (including the
four main pro-independence parties which have representatives in the
Scottish parliament).
Independence First had distributed 10,000 leaflets for the event and had
launched an e-petition through the Scottish Parliament, this e-petition is
ongoing for another month.
Speakers
at the after march rally included official representatives of the SNP,
SSP, Greens and Solidarity parties plus Bill Wilson, Lloyd Quinan and
Campbell Martin MSP as well as Scotia and Ted Christopher who provided
musical entertainment.
The rally
began with an outline of the situation that had led to the union by Dr
Tony Parker an academic from the University of Dundee. Dr Parker pointed
out that political control had been lost with the 1603 union of crowns as
had trade with France. The English Government eventually effectively
threatened Scotland with invasion after cutting off her trade routes and
bribed the politicians of the day.
Bill
Wilson of the SNP who spoke for Independence First pointed out that these
politicians "fled through the back door" from an angry mob and the
numerous petitions lodged by the Scottish public against the union. Wilson
said the importance of Independence First was that it was broad enough to
include absolutely everyone who supported independence and he also
mentioned the e-petition IF are running through the Scottish Parliament
(sign
here).
Independence First activist Chris Osborne gave some of the history of
Independence First and explained that the movement had started from
initial internet discussions around a small group of activists who were
deliberately drawn from different political opinions to think up ideas to
promote independence. These ideas eventually solidified behind the
referendum proposal as being the best route to achieve the maximum
possible support for independence and the campaign had grown from there.
Tommy
Sheridan MSP of Solidarity said that his vision was of a free socialist
republic without nuclear weapons and he fully endorsed Independence
First's call for a democratic referendum as the first step towards that
aim. Carolyn Leckie of the SSP said that her commitment to Independence
had been absolute ever since she was a young child and that Scottish
independence was the key to unlocking a much fairer society.
Aileen
Campbell of the Scottish National Party blasted the Liberal Democrats for
ruling out an Independence Referendum "How can they call themselves
Democrats?" she asked. "Make no mistake if we win an election we will hold
our referendum and will win it for the people of Scotland" she pledged.
Lloyd
Quinan announced that the campaign had received supportive messages from
other national independence groupings in the Basque Country, Catalonia and
Corsica. "There is huge international support behind our cause. Our simple
demand for a referendum on independence can be respected by any democrat.
To a resounding cheer he said "I am Scottish not British". He added
"Anything the British or Brutish Imperial State does, it doesn't do in my
name or the name of the people of Scotland we need our own international
voice."
Activists
from all parties and groups were impressed by the organisation of the
event and the substantial turnout. Douglas Blackie an SNP activist from
Aberdeen commented "This was a fantastic day and a fantastic march. I'd
say it was bigger than the SNP's Bannockburn marches, it's the best march
I've seen for years."
Brian
Archibald a Shop Steward from Midlothian commented "This was the broadest
and most positive political demonstration I can remember from twenty years
campaigning for independence."
Joe
Middleton Press Officer of Independence First said the march was "a powerful
message to the Scottish parliament that democracy will not be denied for
the people of Scotland." and he also said it proved the worth of having a
campaign purely about support for a democratic referendum on independence.
"The
great turnout here today proves that our campaign has genuine political
weight. The next step will be to call for a million people to use their
votes for independence in the first and second votes for the Scottish
Parliament. One million people is not an awful lot of voters for a country
our size and we believe it's well within
the grasp of the independence movement if we work together."
MSPS REJECT INDEPENDENCE REFERENDUM DEBATE
CALLS
MSPs today (15/11) voted down calls for Holyrood to
debate holding a referendum on Scottish independence. The campaign group
Independence First had put forward a petition to the Scottish Parliament on
the issue.
It attracted more than 1,300 signatures in support and
called on MSPs to debate what the Parliament could do to bring about an
early referendum but members of Holyrood's Public Petitions Committee voted
by six to three to simply note the petition and close it, taking no further
action.
Sandra White, the SNP MSP for the Glasgow region, had
wanted to find out ministers' views on the matter. She insisted: "I think
the Scottish Parliament does have the powers to look at this, setting up a
referendum. There's nothing to stop the Scottish Parliament arranging for a
referendum because that would not involve a change in the law."
That was supported by former SNP member Campbell
Martin. Mr Martin, now an independent MSP for the West of Scotland, said the
unionist parties should not be scared of holding such a vote. He said: "If
you are not scared of democracy and people power, I don't see why you
shouldn't ask the people this question and why the Scottish Parliament
should not play a part in doing that. Let's ask the Executive whether it can
do anything to facilitate such a referendum and what its position would be."
But Jackie Baillie, the Labour MSP for Dumbarton,
argued Scots had had their say on the issue at last year's general election.
She said: "At the last democratic opportunity for people to voice their
opinion on this, the general election, I believe the share of the vote for
parties supporting independence dropped substantially."
And committee convener Michael McMahon pointed out
people would also have the chance to make their feelings known at next
year's Scottish Parliament elections.
He said: "We will have a debate called an election,
political parties will be elected, some of them will say: 'We will have a
referendum.' If the outcome of that is that those parties win, then they can
take that issue up and they can debate it."
He spoke out against the idea of writing to the
Executive on the matter, saying: "At the present time the Scottish Executive
doesn't support independence. There's no point in us writing to the
Executive for the Executive to tell us exactly what we already know."
Afterwards Joe Middleton, the media officer for
Independence First commented: "A UK wide election with a biased media
concentrating on London based parties is hardly an accurate representation
of Scotland's feelings about independence! "
“It is a great pity that the executive has not only
decided to ignore all the people who signed our e-petition, but also the two
and a half million people who according to opinion polls support
independence. The idea that the results of the last election gave a clear
indication of the public's thoughts on constitutional change is entirely
false - as we made clear in our written submission to the committee.
"People vote for political parties for a variety of
different reasons. Independence is supported by individuals on the left and
right of politics and some of those people support Labour, Tories and Lib
Dems. The only way to get a clear idea of the Scottish public's desires on
independence is to ask them directly. This executive isn't asking because it
doesn't think it will like the answer.” |